Films
2003 |
|
|
one4review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Film Page |
|
|
Contact us |
|
|
Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Ring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Director:
Hideo Nakata
Stars:
Nanako Matsushima, Hiroyuki Sanada, Miki Nakatani, Yuko Takeuchi,
Hitomi Sato
Certificate:
18
Running
time:
95 minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ring was
originally a low-budget Japanese horror film from 1998. However,
as is often the case when a low-budget flick is successful, it has
been remade for the Western world.
The basic
story is of an urban legend, the type that teenagers discuss to
try and scare one another. There is a videotape of a woman's
nightmare. When you watch the tape, you receive a phone call at
the end, and are told that you have seven days to live. If this is
the case then quite why anyone would wish to view the tape is
enough to ponder, but as this is essentially a horror film, then
all logic pretty much flies right out the window.
After the
death of her niece, single-mother Rachel Keller (Naomi Watts) does
a bit of investigating to find out what happened. She discovers
the story of the tape, and how three of her niece's friends died
at the same time on the same night. Once on the trail, the story
takes on some of the usual predictable horror film parameters. The
main one being that although she believes that the tape connects
the deaths, she decides to watch it.
The
rising-star Watts (Mulholland Drive) is quite good as Rachel. She
manages to convincingly play the roles of devoted single-mother,
investigative journalist, and horror-flick victim. Her portrayal
almost leads the film away from being a strict horror film, and at
times it seems more like a detective-style thriller.
The only
other cast member that is easily recognisable is Brian Cox. He is
only in the film for two or three scenes, and although he gives
the type of reliable performance that film fans have come to
expect from him, the inclusion of his character is pretty
pointless.
Martin
Henderson plays Rachel's ex-husband Noah, and is quite good too.
David Dorfman plays Rachel's son Aidan, and has a spooky air about
him, much like that of Haley Joel Osment in The Sixth Sense,
although his performance here is not nearly as good.
Overall, I
was disappointed. I'm not a big fan of horror films anyway, but I
think the two key elements to a decent horror film is to be funny
and not take itself too seriously, such as films like Final
Destination or Idle Hands, or scary. Unfortunately this film is
neither. There is a fair amount of atmosphere about it, which does
help to create a spookier feel. However, The Ring misses a few
decent opportunities to genuinely frighten the pants off the
audience, particularly during the scenes that the story moves away
and begins to feel like a thriller as opposed to a horror. As a
thriller it would be workable, but for the supernatural ending.
It's a film that is very much stuck between genres, not knowing
which it really wishes to settle in.
If
you're a horror fan, then there's nothing much here that will
frighten you, and if you're a fan of thrillers, the whole
supernatural theme makes it too unbelievable to be truly
convincing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|